CLAT PG Most Important Topics 2027: High-Weightage Areas & PYQ Analysis

CLAT PG 2027 Most Important Topics: Overview

The CLAT PG syllabus covers a wide range of legal subjects, but not all topics carry the same approximate weightage.

Core Subject	Approximate Weightage
Constitutional Law	20-25 marks
Jurisprudence	10-15 marks
Criminal Law	10-15 marks
Law of Contract	8-10 marks
Administrative Law	5-8 marks
Company Law	5-8 marks
Law of Torts	5-8 marks
Public International Law	5-8 marks
Environmental Law	5-8 marks
Family Law	Around 5 marks
Labour & Industrial Law	Around 5 marks
Property Law	Around 5 marks
Tax Law	3-5 marks

These figures are approximate and should guide preparation time rather than predict the exact number of questions in CLAT PG 2027.

Constitutional Law should receive the largest preparation share because of its estimated 20-25 marks. Jurisprudence and Criminal Law form the next major group. Contract Law also deserves early attention because of its estimated 8-10 marks. The remaining subjects should be covered after the CLAT PG 2027 high weightage topics are under control.

Which CLAT PG 2027 Subjects Should You Prioritise First?

You can create a CLAT PG preparation order based on approximate weightage.

• First priority: Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence and Criminal Law. Together, these three areas account for an estimated 40-55 marks. This makes them the starting point for concept building, question practice and revision.
• Second priority: Law of Contract. With an estimated 8-10 marks, Contract Law sits between the major subjects and the 5-8 mark subjects. It should be studied after the first three areas have a workable base.
• Third priority: Administrative Law, Company Law, Torts, Public International Law and Environmental Law. Each is estimated at 5-8 marks. You can prepare these subjects alongside PYQs and short revision notes.
• Fourth priority: Family Law, Labour & Industrial Law, Property Law and Tax Law. These areas have smaller approximate weightage. They still need coverage because every mark matters in a competitive paper. This order is only a study-priority framework. It should not be treated as a guarantee of how many questions CLAT PG 2027 will contain from any subject.

Join CLAT PG Online Coaching for structured preparation and expert guidance.

Important Constitutional Law Topics

Constitutional Law deserves the largest preparation window because its estimated share is around 20-25 marks. Divide it into connected constitutional themes.

Fundamental Rights

Focus on the scope of individual rights, particularly equality, liberty and life. Questions may test how these rights operate and how courts have interpreted constitutional provisions.

Judicial Review and Writ Jurisdiction

Revise the constitutional role of courts in reviewing legislative and administrative action. Study Articles 32 and 226, along with the purpose and scope of constitutional remedies.

Basic Structure Doctrine

Understand the idea behind limitations on the amending power and the constitutional principles protected through the doctrine. Connect the doctrine with important judgments.

Amendment of the Constitution

Study Article 368 alongside the constitutional amendment process and the judicial limits on amending power.

Federalism and Centre-State Relations

Focus on the distribution of authority between the Union and States and the constitutional issues that arise from that division.

Emergency Provisions

Revise the constitutional framework governing emergencies and the powers that become relevant during such situations.

Separation of Powers

Understand the respective functions of the legislature, executive and judiciary and the constitutional checks between them.

Preamble, DPSPs and Fundamental Duties

These topics should not be treated as isolated definitions. Revise their constitutional significance and their relationship with Fundamental Rights and other constitutional principles.

For Constitutional Law, maintain a separate judgment list. When a principle is repeatedly connected with a landmark case, remember the legal issue, principle and outcome.

Explore Our Related Blogs:

CLAT PG Notification	CLAT PG Results
CLAT PG Eligibility Criteria	CLAT PG Answer Key
CLAT PG Registration Form	CLAT PG Colleges

Criminal Law, Jurisprudence and Administrative Law: Key Areas

Jurisprudence and Criminal Law will have approximately 10-15 marks each, while Administrative Law is estimated at 5-8 marks. These subjects therefore need structured preparation.

Jurisprudence

Prioritise the following areas:

• Nature and definition of law
• Sources of law
• Austin, Kelsen, Hart and Salmond
• Legal rights and duties
• Justice and morality
• Ownership and possession
• Legal liability and sanctions
• Legal personality
• Natural Law and Legal Realism

In jurisprudence, the differences between theories are particularly important. Make short comparison notes for major thinkers.

Criminal Law

The high-priority areas include:

• Mens rea
• General exceptions
• Joint liability
• Offences against persons and property
• Criminal defences
• Sentencing principles

While revising criminal law, focus on the ingredients of an offence and the circumstances that affect criminal responsibility. A question may require you to apply a legal principle to facts.

Administrative Law

Focus on the following areas:

• Delegated legislation
• Judicial review
• Natural justice
• Administrative discretion
• Tribunals
• Ombudsman and Lokpal

Understand natural justice and judicial review through their application to administrative decisions. For delegated legislation, revise the limits on delegated power and the purpose of judicial control.

Contract, Torts, Family Law and Other Subjects: What Not to Skip

Once the three highest-priority subjects and Contract Law are covered, move systematically through the remaining areas.

Law of Contract

The key areas are:

• Offer and acceptance
• Consideration
• Free consent
• Void and voidable contracts
• Breach and remedies
• Quasi contracts
• Indemnity and guarantee
• Agency

Law of Torts

Revise negligence, nuisance, defamation, vicarious liability, strict and absolute liability, and remedies. The distinction between different forms of liability deserves special attention. Questions can test whether a particular set of facts satisfies the requirements of a specific tort or liability principle.

Family Law

Cover marriage and divorce, maintenance, adoption and guardianship, succession and inheritance, and the concept of a Uniform Civil Code.

Property Law

Focus on transfer of property, sale, lease and mortgage, easements and licences, part performance, ownership and possession.

Company Law

Key areas include incorporation, directors' duties, corporate governance, share capital, and winding up.

Public International Law

Revise sources of international law, state jurisdiction and immunity, treaties, recognition of states and governments, and the International Court of Justice.

Tax Law

Focus on direct and indirect taxes, basic income tax and GST concepts, constitutional provisions on taxation, and tax assessment and appeals.

Environmental Law

Important areas include the Environment Protection Act, 1986, Polluter Pays Principle, sustainable development, PIL and major international environmental conventions.

Labour and Industrial Law

Prepare industrial disputes, trade unions, minimum wages and bonus laws, social security provisions and the Labour Codes, 2020. The purpose of this stage is coverage. 

A subject worth around five marks should not take as much preparation time as Constitutional Law. But leaving it completely untouched can create avoidable gaps.

How to Identify a High-Priority Topic from CLAT PG Previous Year Papers

PYQs should be used to identify how a topic is tested, not just to create a list of repeated chapter names. Start by sorting questions subject-wise. Then mark the legal principle tested in each question.

For example, a question may come from Constitutional Law, but the actual concept being tested could be judicial review, federalism, Fundamental Rights or the Basic Structure Doctrine.

Next, identify whether the question is:

• Based on a judgment or case principle
• Based on a statutory or constitutional provision
• Concept-based
• Application-based
• Built around a passage

Next, create a topic frequency sheet. If a particular concept appears across multiple PYQs or is connected with several important judgments, move it higher on your revision list.

Do not assume that a topic is unimportant simply because you did not find it repeatedly in a limited PYQ set. PYQs are useful evidence for preparation, but they cannot guarantee the exact content of the next paper.

For every important PYQ, record three things: the legal issue, the rule or principle, and why the correct option follows from that principle. This approach makes revision faster than repeatedly solving the same question without understanding its legal basis.

Check Out More Useful Blogs:

CLAT PG Exam: All details	CLAT PG Admit Card
CLAT PG Cut Off	CLAT PG Previous Year Question Papers
CLAT PG 2026 Question Paper	CLAT PG 2025 Question Paper

CLAT PG 2027 Important Topics Based on Judgment-Based Questions

Judgment-based preparation matters because legal passages may require you to understand the principle established or discussed in a case and then apply it to the question. The following judgments can be used as a focused revision set:

• Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985)
• Supreme Court Advocates on Record v. Union of India (2015)
• People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2013)
• Om Prakash v. Dil Bahar (2005)
• Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan (1997)
• R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)

This is an important Constitutional Law judgment to revise with federalism, Centre-State relations and the constitutional framework governing the use of emergency powers in States. For each judgment, avoid memorising only the case name and year. Make a four-part note: Case, Issue, Legal Principle and Application.

Given below is the CLAT PG 2025 judgment passage for reference:

The landmark judgment of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa & Others, delivered by the Supreme Court of India in 1978, significantly influenced the interpretation of the term ‘industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The case centered on whether the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board, a statutory body, could be classified as an industry under the Act, thereby making its employees eligible for certain protections and benefits. Prior to this case, the definition of ‘industry’ had been subject to varied interpretations, leading to confusion and inconsistency in its application. The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, broadly defined ‘industry’ to include any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture, calling or service, employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen. However, this expansive definition left room for ambiguity, especially concerning statutory bodies and non-profit organizations. In this case, the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board argued that it was not an industry, emphasizing its statutory duties and public welfare objectives. The Board contended that its primary purpose was to provide essential services, not to engage in profit-making activities typical of private enterprises. On the other hand, the respondents, including A. Rajappa, argued that the Board’s activities fell within the scope of an industry as defined by the Act, and that its employees should be entitled to the benefits and protections accorded to workers in industries. 

The Supreme Court, in its judgment delivered by Chief Justice M. Hameedullah Beg, laid down a broad and inclusive definition of ‘industry’. The Court asserted that what mattered was the nature of the activity and the relationship between the employer and the employees. This interpretation aimed to ensure that a wide range of workers, including those employed in public utility services, statutory bodies, and even some non-profit organizations, would be covered under the protective umbrella of the Industrial Disputes Act. The decision in Bangalore Water Supply v. A. Rajappa & Others had far-reaching implications. It extended the scope of labour protections to a broader spectrum of workers, ensuring that more employees could benefit from the dispute resolution mechanisms and safeguards provided under the Industrial Disputes Act. This judgment underscored the judiciary’s role in interpreting labour laws to promote social justice and protect workers’ rights in a rapidly industrializing nation.

Source: Extract from Bangalore Water Supply v. A. Rajappa & Others, 1978 2 SCC

1. According to the Supreme Court's judgment, what is the most important factor in determining whether an activity constitutes an industry?

(a) The profit-making motive of the employer

(b) When there are multiple activities carried on by an establishment, its dominant function has to be considered. If the dominant function is not commercial, benefits of a workman of an industry under Industrial Dispute Act may be given

(c) The nature of the activity and the authority of the employer over its employees

(d) When there are multiple activities carried on by an establishment, all the activities must be considered. Even if one activity is commercial, the employees will not get the benefit of workman of an industry under the Industrial Disputes Act

2. Which of the following best describes the broader impact of the judgment?

(a) It reduced labour protections for workers

(b) It extended labour protection to a broader spectrum of workers

(c) It had no significant impact on labour laws

(d) It only affected private sector workers

3. Which of the following best describes the term ‘industry’ as defined by the Supreme Court in this judgment?

(a) Any activity involving profit-making

(b) Any systematic activity organized by cooperation between an employer and employees for producing or distributing goods and services

(c) Only activities conducted by private enterprises

(d) Activities limited to manufacturing sectors

4. In which of the following landmark judgement, the Supreme Court held that when an association or society of apartment owners employs workers for personal services to its members, those workers do not qualify as workmen under the Act and the association is not an “industry” under the Industrial Disputes Act?

(a) Som Vihar Apartment Owners’ Housing Maintenance Society Ltd. v. Workmen, 2009 SC

(b) Anand Vihar Apartment Owners’ Society Ltd. v. Workmen, 2024 SC

(c) Kanchanjunga Building Employees Union v. Kanchanjung Flat Owners Society & Anr., 2024 SC

(d) None of the above

5. Under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, what is the role of the “Works Committee” and which of the following correctly describes its function?

(a) The Works committee is a body formed by the Central government to address wage disputes between employer and employee in public sector industries

(b) The Works committee is a grievance redressal body constituted by the employer, primarily to promote measures for securing amity and good relations between the employer and employee

(c) The Works Committee is responsible for making binding decisions on industrial disputes related to layoffs, retrenchment and closure of industrial units

(d) All of the above

Answer Key with Explanation

1. Answer: B

Explanation: 

(A) The profit-making motive of the employer – This is incorrect because the Supreme Court in the Bangalore Water Supply case clearly held that an activity need not be profit-oriented to qualify as an industry. Even organizations engaged in charitable or welfare activities can be considered industries if they involve systematic activity and employer-employee relationships.

(B) When there are multiple activities carried on by an establishment, its dominant function has to be considered. If the dominant function is not commercial, benefits of a workman of an industry under Industrial Dispute Act may be given – This is correct. The Court emphasized that the dominant nature of the activity must be examined in determining whether an establishment is an industry. If the primary function is non-commercial but involves systematic service and employment, the workers may still be entitled to protection under the Act.

(C) The nature of the activity and the authority of the employer over its employees – This is partly relevant but not complete. While the nature of activity and the presence of employer-employee relationship are factors, the Supreme Court primarily relied on the dominant function principle in composite activities rather than authority or control alone.

(D) When there are multiple activities carried on by an establishment, all the activities must be considered. Even if one activity is commercial, the employees will not get the benefit of workman of an industry under the Industrial Disputes Act – This is incorrect. The Court did not adopt a disqualifying approach based on any one commercial activity. Instead, it focused on whether the main or dominant function qualifies the establishment as an industry.

2. Answer: B

Explanation: 

(a) It reduced labour protections for workers: Incorrect.

This is the opposite of what the judgment did. The decision expanded the definition of ‘industry’ to cover more types of establishments, especially statutory bodies, educational institutions, and public utility services, thus bringing more workers under the protection of the Industrial Disputes Act.

(b) It extended labour protections to a broader spectrum of workers: Correct.

This is precisely the most accurate description of the impact. The judgment brought a wide range of employers—including statutory authorities and some non-profits—within the scope of the Act, thereby extending the rights and protections of ‘workmen’ to those employed in these sectors.

(c) It had no significant impact on labour laws: Incorrect.

The judgment had profound and far-reaching implications. It led to the inclusion of previously excluded sectors under the Act and influenced industrial jurisprudence for decades. Saying it had no impact is factually incorrect.

(d) It only affected private sector workers: Incorrect.

The case involved a statutory authority, and one of its key contributions was to clarify that even public statutory bodies could be industries. Hence, it significantly affected public sector employees, not just private sector ones.

3. Answer: B

Explanation: 

(a) Any activity involving profit-making: Incorrect.

Profit-making is not a requirement for an activity to qualify as an industry. Non-profit entities and statutory bodies can still be industries if they meet the test of organized, systematic activity involving employer-employee cooperation.

(b) Any systematic activity organized by cooperation between an employer and employees for producing or distributing goods and services: Correct.

This definition accurately reflects the principles laid down in the Bangalore Water Supply judgment. The Court emphasized the structured nature of the activity and the relationship of employer and employee, regardless of whether profit is made.

(c) Only activities conducted by private enterprises: Incorrect.

The case expanded the term to include statutory bodies, public utilities, and even some non-profits. Limiting the term to private enterprises contradicts the broad interpretation adopted by the Court.

(d) Activities limited to manufacturing sectors: Incorrect.

The Court explicitly held that service sectors and even public utility functions, if carried out in an organized manner involving employer-employee relationships, can constitute an industry. It was not limited to manufacturing.

4. Answer: A

Explanation: 

(a) Som Vihar Apartment Owners’ Housing Maintenance Society Ltd. v. Workmen, 2009 SC: Correct.

In this case, the Supreme Court held that cooperative societies or residential apartment associations which employ workers for the personal and domestic benefit of their members do not constitute an industry, as their activities are not systematic commercial ventures but rather internal service arrangements. The workers do not serve the general public or carry out a commercial service, so they are not “workmen” under the Act.

(b) Anand Vihar Apartment Owners’ Society Ltd. v. Workmen, 2024 SC: Incorrect.

There is no such reported judgment in 2024. The option is fictitious or incorrect.

(c) Kanchanjunga Building Employees Union v. Kanchanjunga Flat Owners Society & Anr., 2024 SC: Incorrect.

Again, this is not a reported Supreme Court case. Even if such a matter were to exist, it is not recognized as a landmark case on this principle.

(d) None of the above: Incorrect.

Option (A) is the correct answer, so “None of the above” cannot be chosen.

5. Answer: B

Explanation: 

(a) The Works Committee is a body formed by the Central government to address wage disputes between employer and employee in public sector industries: Incorrect.

The Works Committee is not formed by the Central Government; it is constituted by the employer as mandated under Section 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act. Moreover, it does not specifically deal with wage disputes, nor is it confined to public sector industries.

(b) The Works committee is a grievance redressal body constituted by the employer, primarily to promote measures for securing and preserving amity and good relations between the employer and employee: Correct.

This accurately reflects Section 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Works Committee consists of representatives of employers and workers, and its primary role is to ensure harmony and address day-to-day grievances before they escalate into industrial disputes.

(c) The Works Committee is responsible for making binding decisions on industrial disputes related to layoffs, retrenchment and closure of industrial units: Incorrect.

The Works Committee does not have adjudicatory powers. It cannot make binding decisions or handle major disputes like layoffs or retrenchment. Such matters are referred to Labour Courts or Tribunals under other provisions of the Act.

(d) All of the above: Incorrect.

Practice with CLAT PG Mock Tests and boost your accuracy.

CLAT PG Previous Year Passage With Questions and Answers

Given below is the CLAT PG 2025 passage with the answer for reference:

Passage: 1 - Dominic Ongwen, a former commander of the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) in Uganda, was convicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in February 2021. The case marked a significant milestone in international criminal law, focusing on issues of child soldiering, forced marriage, and sexual and gender-based violence. Ongwen was found guilty of 61 counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes, including murder, torture, enslavement, forced marriage, rape, and conscription of children under the age of 15 into armed groups. The ICC's judgment emphasized the importance of accountability for leaders who exploit children in conflicts and commit sexual and gender-based crimes.

A critical aspect of the judgment was the consideration of Ongwen's own history as a child soldier. Ongwen was abducted by the LRA at around the age of nine and was forced to commit atrocities as he rose through the ranks. The judgment carefully balanced the gravity of his crimes, ultimately ruling that his personal history did not absolve him of responsibility for his actions as an adult commander. The judgment is also notable for its comprehensive approach to reparations for victims. The ICC ordered collective reparations, including symbolic measures and physical, psychological rehabilitation, and financial compensation to support the victims and their communities. This case reinforces the ICC's commitment to addressing serious international crimes, particularly those involving vulnerable populations such as children and women, and underscores the principles of justice and reparation in international criminal law.

Source: This extract is taken from Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen (ICC, 2021)

Questions

1. Which principle of international criminal law ensures that individuals, regardless of their position or rank, can be held accountable for committing serious international crimes?

(a) Sovereign immunity

(b) Command responsibility

(c) Diplomatic immunity

(d) Universal jurisdiction

2. In the context of international criminal law, what does the principle of “individual criminal responsibility” entail?

(a) Only states can be held accountable for international crimes

(b) Individuals can be held personally liable for committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide

(c) Individuals are immune from prosecution if they act under state orders

(d) Only military personnel can be held responsible for international crimes

3. The concept of “crimes against humanity” includes which of the following acts, as exemplified in the Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen case?

(a) Piracy and terrorism

(b) Enslavement, forced marriage, and sexual violence

(c) Espionage and Sabotage

(d) Intellectual Property Theft

4. What is the significance of the principle of “complementarity” in the context of the International Criminal Court (ICC)?

(a) The ICC can prosecute cases only when national jurisdictions are unwilling or unable to do so

(b) The ICC has primary jurisdiction over all international crimes

(c) The ICC can only prosecute crimes committed within its member states

(d) The ICC shares jurisdiction equally with national courts

5. Which of the following statements best describes the significance of the Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen case in the context of international criminal law?

(a) It was the first case to address environmental crimes in international conflicts

(b) It marked a milestone in addressing sexual and gender-based violence and the exploitation of children in armed conflicts

(c) It was the first case to involve cybercrimes committed by international armed groups

(d) It primarily focused on the financial aspects of running an armed group

Answer Key with Explanation

1. Answer: D

Explanation: 

(A) Sovereign immunity

Protects heads of state or officials from being prosecuted; prevents accountability, not ensures it.

(B) Command responsibility

Holds commanders accountable for subordinates’ crimes but applies only to those in command.

(C) Diplomatic immunity

Shields diplomats from prosecution; not a principle of accountability.

(D) Universal jurisdiction

Allows any state or court (like the ICC) to try any individual, regardless of rank or nationality, for serious crimes (e.g., war crimes, genocide).

2. Answer: B

Explanation: 

(a) Only states can be held accountable for international crimes

This reflects an outdated notion rejected after the Nuremberg Trials. Today’s international law recognizes that individuals, not just states, bear criminal responsibility for core international crimes.

(b) Individuals can be held personally liable for committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide

This is the core of the principle. The Rome Statute and other international instruments focus on punishing individuals who perpetrate heinous crimes, regardless of their role or orders received (B) Individuals can be held personally liable for committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. The principle of “individual criminal responsibility” establishes that individuals, not just states, can be held criminally liable for committing international crimes such as war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, as demonstrated in the Ongwen case.

(c) Individuals are immune from prosecution if they act under state orders

This is incorrect because “following orders” is no longer a complete defense. Under the Rome Statute, such a defense may only mitigate punishment in limited situations.

(d) Only military personnel can be held responsible for international crimes

Liability is not limited to military actors. Civilians, political leaders, and business figures have also been held accountable, as in the Nuremberg and ICC cases.

3. Answer: B

Explanation: 

(a) Piracy and terrorism

These are grave offenses but classified separately under international law. They are not listed as crimes against humanity in the Rome Statute.

(b) Enslavement, forced marriage, and sexual violence

These acts were central to Ongwen’s prosecution at the ICC. They are among the core crimes against humanity and were explicitly addressed in the charges and conviction. “Crimes against humanity” encompasses serious offenses like enslavement, forced marriage, and sexual violence, which were key elements in the Ongwen case. These crimes are committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack on civilians.

(c) Espionage and sabotage

These acts are relevant in national security or military contexts but are not categorized as crimes against humanity under international criminal law.

(d) Intellectual property theft

This is a civil and commercial law issue. It does not fall within the ambit of international criminal law or the concept of crimes against humanity.

4. Answer: A

Explanation: 

(a) The ICC can prosecute cases only when national jurisdictions are unwilling or unable to do so

This principle reflects respect for national sovereignty and judicial systems. ICC only steps in when justice is not served domestically, maintaining a subsidiary role.

(b) The ICC has primary jurisdiction over all international crimes

Incorrect. The ICC is a court of last resort. States have the first responsibility to investigate and prosecute international crimes.

(c) The ICC can only prosecute crimes committed within its member states

Not accurate. The ICC can act beyond member states' territories if the UN Security Council refers a situation or if the crime involves a national of a member state.

(d) The ICC shares jurisdiction equally with national courts

This is misleading. The ICC does not have equal standing; it acts only when states fail to act genuinely.

5. Answer: B

Explanation: 

(a) It was the first case to address environmental crimes in international conflicts

This is incorrect. The case had no focus on environmental issues. It dealt with war crimes and crimes against humanity.

(b) It marked a milestone in addressing sexual and gender-based violence and the exploitation of children in armed conflicts

Correct. The case was historic for recognizing forced marriage, sexual slavery, and use of child soldiers as crimes against humanity, setting a precedent for gender-based justice. Ongwen’s conviction highlighted the ICC’s focus on crimes such as enslavement, forced marriage, and the recruitment of child soldiers.

(c) It was the first case to involve cybercrimes committed by international armed groups

Cybercrimes are not part of this case. The ICC is yet to establish jurisprudence on cyber warfare or related crimes.

(d) It primarily focused on the financial aspects of running an armed group

This was not the central theme. The case focused on criminal responsibility for acts of violence, not financial crimes.

Explore Important Topics of Indian Constitution:

Constitution of India	Schedules of Indian Constitution
Sources of Indian Constitution	Articles of Indian Constitution
Preamble to Constitution of India	Parts of Indian Constitution
Salient Features of Indian Constitution	Amendments of the Indian Constitution
Fundamental Rights of Indian Constitution Borrowed From Which Country?	Fundamental Duties of Indian Constitution Borrowed From Which Country?