The Law Prep and LegalEdge controversy started soon after the CLAT 2026 results were declared and Geetali Gupta secured AIR-1. What should have been a moment of pure celebration quickly turned into the AIR-1 Geetali Gupta controversy, raising serious questions about how coaching results are being claimed and presented.
Law Prep Tutorial has made one thing very clear from the start—students are free to give credit to any institute they trust. The controversy began when a video appeared where Geetali was seen denying any association with Law Prep Tutorial, even though she had taken structured training, mentorship, tests, and academic support from Law Prep during her preparation.
This was not a simple credit choice but an attempt to damage Law Prep’s reputation by forcing a public denial. This Law Prep Tutorial and LegalEdge controversy has now sparked a wider discussion on ethics, student pressure, and how far institutes like LegalEdge should go to market their results.
Who is Geetali Gupta? AIR-1 CLAT 2026
AIR-1 CLAT 2026 Geetali Gupta is a top-performing law aspirant from Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, who secured the highest rank in one of the most competitive CLAT exams in recent years. During her preparation journey, she was part of Law Prep Tutorial’s OG Batch, a highly selective program where only the top 50 students from across India are chosen purely on merit.
In this batch, students undergo rigorous academic training, receive advanced study material, one-to-one mentorship from senior faculty, and benefit from deep performance analysis and targeted improvement plans. The OG Batch is designed for serious toppers, and Geetali’s selection into it reflected her strong potential and consistent performance throughout her preparation phase.
Did Geetali Gupta Prepare for CLAT from Law Prep Tutorial?
Yes. Geetali Gupta’s association with Law Prep is based on clear academic participation and documented records. Geetali was selected into Law Prep’s OG Batch, a merit-only program where the top 50 students across India are trained through intensive classes, advanced study material, deep mock analysis, and focused mentoring. Her mock test records and performance analytics form part of this training journey.
Along with the OG Batch, Geetali also purchased Law Prep’s CLAT Game Changer Kit (worth ₹15,000 + GST), which includes advanced practice material and exam-focused resources. She also bought the Champions Toolkit (CTK) shortly before the exam to strengthen final revision and accuracy.
In addition, she appeared for Law Prep’s CLAT Scholarship Test, a program used by serious aspirants to benchmark performance nationally.
Most importantly, Geetali received academic mentorship from Anupama Joshi Ma’am, CLAT Academic Head at Law Prep, a faculty with 20+ years of experience and an alumna of GNLU and NLU Jodhpur. Payment receipts, enrollment records, and proofs related to these associations are available and will be attached for transparency.
Proofs That Geetali Gupta Was a Law Prep Student
Find all the proofs that AIR-1 Geetali Gupta was a student of Law Prep Tutorial:
| S. No. | Type of Association | Proof / Reference Link |
| 1 | Geetali Gupta’s Scholarship Report | Link |
| 2 | Geetali’s LPT Report Card (OG Batch) | Link |
| 3 | Study Material Dispatch Slip | Link |
| 4 | Receipt of CLAT DLP (Game Changer Kit) | Link |
| 5 | Geetali Gupta’s Chat With Anupama Ma’am | Link |
The Geetali Gupta’s Controversial LegalEdge Video
LegalEdge has signed marketing contracts with the AIR-1 topper Geetali Gupta, turning her into a year-long promotional asset. These contracts come with high commercial value, along with so-called gifts like iPhones and MacBooks, after which the student is expected to strictly follow the institute’s marketing instructions.
Following this, a video was released where the topper publicly denied any association with Law Prep and spoke in a way that damaged its reputation.
After this video surfaced, Law Prep Tutorial spoke directly with Geetali Gupta’s school teacher, who confirmed that she did not want to record the video but felt compelled to do so. Later, the topper herself reportedly regretted the video and asked LegalEdge to remove it. She even conveyed that if the video was not deleted, she would record another video on her own social media to clarify the truth. Soon after this, LegalEdge deleted the video from its official platforms, which further strengthened Law Prep’s stand on the issue.
LegalEdge’s Pattern of Buying CLAT Toppers
The CLAT 2026 controversy is not an isolated case, but part of a larger, recurring pattern where LegalEdge tries to project an unusually high number of CLAT toppers every year—especially in the Top 10 AIRs—through selective and managed claims.
1. CLAT 2025: Same Toppers, Two Institutes, Same “Offline” Claim
In CLAT 2025, both Career Launcher (CL) and LegalEdge showcased:
- AIR-1 Saksham Gautam
- AIR-2 Anirudh Pathak
- AIR-3 Ananya Tamaskar
At face value, this was not an issue. Students often take help from multiple platforms. The red flag, however, was that both institutes claimed these toppers as offline classroom students at the same time—which is practically impossible.
After questions were raised, LegalEdge quietly changed its claim from offline classroom coaching to online program. The widely known fact remains that AIR-2 and AIR-3 were Career Launcher’s classroom students, making the original claims questionable.
2. Rajat Maloo (CLAT 2017): Selfie-Based Claim
Rajat Maloo, AIR-1 CLAT 2017, was a student of Law Prep’s CLAT coaching in Jaipur. His association with Law Prep is well-documented and publicly verifiable.
LegalEdge began claiming him as their topper only after Karan Mehta, co-founder of LegalEdge, just clicked a selfie with him at his residence. That single interaction was later projected as a full coaching association, despite Rajat Maloo having no formal academic link with LegalEdge.
3. RJS 2025: Judiciary Gold Claiming Sarwar Khan
A more recent and widely discussed example is from RJS 2025 results, where Judiciary Gold, a sister brand of LegalEdge, claimed Rank 19 – Sarwar Khan as their selected candidate.
What made this claim controversial—and even amusing for many in the legal education community—is that Sarwar Khan is a faculty member at Law Prep Judiciary and prepared while teaching there. He had no academic association with Judiciary Gold, making the claim appear baseless.
4. The Larger Concern
Law Prep argues that these repeated instances point towards a result-marketing strategy focused on volume rather than truth—where toppers are rapidly claimed, narratives are adjusted later, and students are used to inflate rankings.
This approach misleads parents and aspirants who trust topper claims while choosing coaching institutes.
Why LegalEdge Manages Toppers Every Year Instead of Building Them?
LegalEdge is a heavily funded company. Once an institute takes large investor money, the pressure changes completely. The focus slowly moves away from teaching and shifts towards numbers, projections, growth decks, and future funding rounds. In such a setup, showing consistent Top 10 AIRs every single year becomes less about academics and more about convincing investors that the edtech model is working.
According to Law Prep, when funding is involved, institutes are pushed to prove strategies quickly. And the fastest way to do that is by showing toppers, not by patiently building them over years.
This creates pressure to manage results, aggressively claim ranks, and control narratives—because investor confidence depends on visible success stories.
FAQs About LegalEdge–Law Prep Controversy
It is about alleged pressure on AIR-1 CLAT 2026 Geetali Gupta to publicly deny her association with Law Prep Tutorial, despite documented academic support taken from Law Prep.
No. Law Prep has clearly said students are free to credit any institute or none. The issue is about forced denial and defamation, not credit-sharing.
Yes. She was part of Law Prep’s OG Batch, purchased study kits, attempted mocks, took scholarship tests, and received academic mentorship.
The OG Batch is a merit-based elite program where the top 50 students nationwide receive advanced material, mentoring, mock analysis, and performance tracking.
Yes. Law Prep has stated that payment receipts, enrollment records, mock data, and participation proofs exist and are being shared transparently.
Yes. This is very common. Students often combine classroom coaching, mocks, test series, and study kits from multiple platforms.
Because it allegedly showed the topper publicly denying any association with Law Prep, which Law Prep claims was done under pressure.
Marketing contracts were signed, turning the topper into a year-long promotional asset.
Yes, LegalEdge operates as a corporate, investor-funded edtech company, according to Law Prep.
Only if the claim is truthful, transparent, and not misleading. Forced narratives cross ethical and legal boundaries.
