article 15 of indian constitution

Article 15 of Indian Constitution: Right Against Discrimination

Article 15 of Indian Constitution protects citizens from discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It is a part of the Right to Equality and works with Article 14 to make equality more practical. Article 15 says that the State cannot treat any citizen unfairly only because of these grounds. It also protects access to public places such as shops, restaurants, hotels, wells, roads, and places maintained for public use. 

At the same time, Article 15 of Constitution allows special provisions for women, children, socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Economically Weaker Sections. This means Article 15 does not only stop discrimination; it also allows positive support for groups that need better opportunities. 

In simple words, Article 15 helps create a society where people are not judged or denied opportunities because of their identity.

  1. The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.
  2. No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them, be subject to any disability, liability, restriction or condition with regard to-
    • access to shops, public restaurants, hotels and places of public entertainment; or
    • the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads and places of public resort maintained wholly or partly out of State funds or dedicated to the use of the general public.
  3. Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.
  4. Nothing in this article or in clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.
  5. Nothing in this article or in sub-clause (g) of clause (1) of article 19 shall prevent the State from making any special provision, by law, for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes in so far as such special provisions relate to their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of article 30.
  6. Nothing in this article or sub-clause (g) of clause (1) of article 19 or clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the State from making-
    • any special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizens other than the classes mentioned in clauses (4) and (5); and
    • any special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizens other than the classes mentioned in clauses (4) and (5) in so far as such special provisions relate to their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of article 30, which in the case of reservation would be in addition to the existing reservations and subject to a maximum of ten per cent of the total seats in each category.

Before independence, India faced deep social discrimination based on caste, gender, religion, and social status. Many people were denied entry to public places, educational spaces, temples, wells, roads, and community facilities. These practices created unequal treatment in everyday life.

After independence, the makers of the Constitution of India wanted to build a country where citizens could not be denied basic access or opportunities because of their identity. Article 15 was added under the Right to Equality to stop such discrimination and to allow positive support for groups that had faced long-term social and educational disadvantages.

ParticularDetails
Article NumberArticle 15
Part of ConstitutionPart III
Fundamental Right CategoryRight to Equality
Main FocusProhibition of discrimination
Available ToIndian citizens only
Discrimination GroundsReligion, race, caste, sex, place of birth
Applies AgainstState action and certain public access restrictions
Public Places CoveredShops, public restaurants, hotels, wells, roads, tanks, bathing ghats, places of public resort
Allows Special ProvisionsYes
Special Provisions ForWomen, children, socially and educationally backward classes, SCs, STs, EWS
Related ArticlesArticle 14, Article 16, Article 17, Article 18
Main PurposeTo stop identity-based discrimination and support social equality
Commonly Asked InCLAT, Judiciary, UPSC, CUET, SSC and other law-related exams

Also check out Facts About Indian Constitution

There are six clauses in Article 15 of Indian Constitution, and each clause deals with a different aspect of discrimination and equality.

Article 15(1): No Discrimination by the State

Article 15(1) prohibits the State from discriminating against any citizen solely on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.

In simple words, the government cannot deny benefits, opportunities, or rights to a person only because they belong to a particular religion, caste, gender, or region. This clause forms the foundation of anti-discrimination protection in India.

Article 15(2): Equal Access to Public Places

Article 15(2) extends protection beyond government actions and ensures that citizens cannot be denied access to public places on the grounds mentioned in Article 15.

This includes:

  • Shops
  • Public restaurants
  • Hotels
  • Places of public entertainment
  • Wells
  • Tanks
  • Bathing ghats
  • Roads
  • Public facilities maintained by public funds

This clause played an important role in ending practices that excluded certain communities from public spaces.

Article 15(3): Special Provisions for Women and Children

Article 15(3) allows the State to create special laws, schemes, and benefits for women and children.

This clause recognizes that certain groups may require additional support and protection. For example, maternity benefits, women’s safety laws, scholarships for girls, and child welfare programs are valid under this provision.

Article 15(4): Special Provisions for Backward Classes, SCs and STs

Article 15(4) allows the government to take steps for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes (SCs), and Scheduled Tribes (STs).

This clause was added through the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951 and forms the constitutional basis for many reservation and welfare policies.

Article 15(5): Reservation in Educational Institutions

Article 15(5) allows the State to make special provisions related to admissions in educational institutions for socially and educationally backward classes, SCs, and STs.

This includes both government and private educational institutions, except minority educational institutions protected under Article 30.

Article 15(6): Special Provisions for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS)

Article 15(6) was added through the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019.

It allows the State to provide benefits and reservations to Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of society who are not covered under SC, ST, or OBC reservation categories. It also allows up to 10% reservation in educational institutions for EWS candidates.

Article 15 specifically prohibits discrimination based on the following grounds:

GroundMeaning
ReligionA person cannot be treated unfairly because they belong to a particular religion or faith
RaceDiscrimination based on ethnic or racial background is prohibited
CasteCitizens cannot be denied opportunities or rights because of their caste
SexNo discrimination can take place simply because a person is male or female
Place of BirthA person cannot be treated unfairly because they were born in a particular state, city, or region
Any Combination of These GroundsThe State cannot discriminate using one or more of these grounds together

Learn about Constitution Day of India here!

Article 15 prohibits discrimination, but it also allows certain special provisions to create fair opportunities for groups that need extra support.

1. Special Provisions for Women

The State can create special laws and schemes for women. Examples include maternity benefits, women’s safety laws, reservation for women in some institutions, and welfare schemes for girls.

2. Special Provisions for Children

Children can receive special protection, education support, nutrition schemes, and welfare measures. These provisions are allowed because children need extra care and development support.

3. Socially and Educationally Backward Classes

The government can make special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes to improve their access to education, development, and opportunities.

4. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

Article 15 allows special measures for SC and ST communities because these groups have faced long-term social and educational disadvantage.

5. Reservation in Educational Institutions

The State can provide reservation in admissions for backward classes, SCs, STs, and EWS in educational institutions, subject to constitutional rules.

6. Economically Weaker Sections

Article 15(6) allows special provisions and up to 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections in educational institutions.

7. Minority Educational Institutions

Article 15(5) does not apply to minority educational institutions protected under Article 30(1). This means such institutions have separate constitutional protection.

  • Protects Citizens from Discrimination: Article 15 ensures that citizens are not treated unfairly because of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It protects dignity and equal status.
  • Ensures Access to Public Places: It gives citizens equal access to shops, hotels, restaurants, roads, wells, and other public places meant for general use.
  • Supports Social Justice: Article 15 allows special provisions for backward classes, SCs, STs, women, children, and EWS groups. This helps reduce long-term social gaps.
  • Promotes Equal Opportunities: By allowing support in education and welfare schemes, Article 15 helps people from disadvantaged groups get better opportunities.
  • Strengthens Right to Equality: Article 15 works with Article 14 and Article 16 to make equality meaningful in real life, not just in legal theory.
  • Helps Remove Social Barriers: This Article plays an important role in fighting caste-based, gender-based, and identity-based exclusion from public life.

Need quick revision notes for Article 15 of Indian Constitution? Download the Article 15 PDF covering meaning, exact text, clause-wise explanation, grounds of discrimination, exceptions, landmark cases, reservation policy, and important exam points.

Article 15 has been interpreted and expanded through several important Supreme Court judgments. These cases have helped define the scope of equality, reservation, discrimination, and special provisions under the Constitution.

CaseKey Contribution
Champakam Dorairajan (1951)Led to insertion of Article 15(4)
M.R. Balaji (1963)Discussed limits of reservation
N.M. Thomas (1976)Equality allows positive support measures
Indra Sawhney (1992)Upheld OBC reservation and 50% ceiling principle
T.M.A. Pai (2002)Educational institution rights
Ashoka Kumar Thakur (2008)Upheld Article 15(5) reservation provisions
Anuj Garg (2008)Strengthened gender equality
Society for Unaided Private Schools (2012)Upheld parts of RTE framework
Sabarimala Case (2018)Applied equality and non-discrimination principles
Janhit Abhiyan (2022)Upheld EWS reservation under Article 15(6)

1. State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951)

This was the first major case related to Article 15. The State of Madras had introduced caste-based quotas in educational institutions. The Supreme Court struck down the policy, stating that it violated Article 15(1).

The judgment led to the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, through which Article 15(4) was added to allow special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes, SCs, and STs.

2. M.R. Balaji v. State of Mysore (1963)

In this case, the Supreme Court examined reservations in educational institutions. The Court held that backwardness should be determined carefully and that reservation should remain within reasonable limits.

This judgment became one of the earliest cases discussing reservation percentages and the concept of backward classes.

3. State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas (1976)

The Supreme Court held that equality does not always mean identical treatment. Special provisions designed to help disadvantaged groups can be consistent with equality.

This judgment strengthened the idea that positive measures for weaker sections do not necessarily violate constitutional equality.

4. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)

Popularly known as the Mandal Commission Case, this is one of the most important reservation cases in India.

The Supreme Court upheld 27% reservation for OBCs and stated that reservation is a valid tool for achieving social justice. The Court also introduced the concept of the 50% reservation ceiling, subject to exceptional circumstances.

5. T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002)

This case dealt with the rights of educational institutions, especially minority institutions. The Court clarified the relationship between educational rights and government regulation.

The judgment later influenced discussions surrounding Article 15(5) and reservation in educational institutions.

6. Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008)

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Article 15(5), which allows reservation for socially and educationally backward classes in educational institutions.

The Court confirmed that reservation in higher education can be used to promote equality and social justice.

7. Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India (2008)

A law prohibited women from working in establishments serving alcohol. The Supreme Court struck down the restriction, holding that it was based on gender stereotypes.

The judgment reinforced that Article 15 protects women from discrimination and promotes gender equality.

8. Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India (2012)

This case examined the constitutional validity of provisions under the Right to Education Act.

The Court upheld the law for most schools while recognizing constitutional protections available to minority educational institutions.

9. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2022)

This case challenged the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, which introduced 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS).

The Supreme Court upheld the amendment and confirmed that EWS reservation does not violate the equality principles under Articles 14 and 15.

10. Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (Sabarimala Case) (2018)

The Court examined restrictions preventing women of certain age groups from entering the Sabarimala Temple.

The judgment discussed equality, dignity, and non-discrimination principles and highlighted the importance of constitutional values over exclusionary practices.

Check Out important Legal Education resources here:

Preamble to Constitution of IndiaDifference between Act and Law 
How to study Law in IndiaHow to Become a Lawyer in India
Highest Paying Legal Career Paths in IndiaUpcoming Law Entrance Exams in India

These are the differences between Article and Article 15:

PointArticle 14Article 15
Main FocusEquality before law and equal protection of lawsProhibition of discrimination
Available ToAll persons, including citizens and foreignersIndian citizens only
Covered UnderRight to EqualityRight to Equality
NatureGeneral equality provisionSpecific anti-discrimination provision
Grounds MentionedNo specific grounds mentionedReligion, race, caste, sex, place of birth
Applies AgainstState actionState action and denial of access to certain public places
Allows ClassificationAllows reasonable classificationAllows special provisions for certain groups
ExampleGovernment cannot act arbitrarilyA citizen cannot be denied public access because of caste or religion

These are the differences between Article 15 and Article 16 of Indian Constitution:

PointArticle 15Article 16
Main FocusProhibition of discriminationEquality of opportunity in public employment
Available ToIndian citizens onlyIndian citizens only
Area CoveredGeneral discrimination and access to public placesGovernment jobs and public employment
Grounds MentionedReligion, race, caste, sex, place of birthReligion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, residence
Reservation AllowedYes, especially in education and welfare measuresYes, mainly in public employment
Public Places CoveredShops, hotels, restaurants, roads, wells and other public placesNot related to public places
ExampleNo citizen can be denied hotel entry due to casteNo citizen can be denied government job opportunity due to religion

Explore more Law-Related Topics here:

Best Books & Novels for Law Students & LawyersLesser Known Law in India
Highest Paid Lawyers in IndiaBasic Structure Doctrine
What is Article 15 of Indian Constitution?

Article 15 prohibits discrimination against citizens on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It is a part of the Right to Equality.

Which Fundamental Right contains Article 15?

Article 15 is part of the Right to Equality, which is covered under Articles 14 to 18 of the Constitution.

Does Article 15 apply to foreigners?

No. Unlike Article 14, Article 15 applies only to Indian citizens.

Does reservation violate Article 15?

No. Reservation is considered constitutional because Article 15 itself permits special provisions for disadvantaged sections of society.

Can a person be denied entry to a public place because of caste?

No. Article 15(2) prohibits discrimination in access to public places on the grounds mentioned in the Constitution.

Which landmark case led to the addition of Article 15(4)?

The State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951) case led to the First Constitutional Amendment and the addition of Article 15(4).

Which Supreme Court case upheld OBC reservation?

The Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) case upheld OBC reservation and became one of the most important judgments on reservation policy.

Explore essential Legal Learning resources:

Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (1973)Anti-Defection Law
Wildlife Protection Act 1972Uniform Civil Code
Kapil Sibal: All DetailsRam Jethmalani: Complete Details
Top Lessons from Ram JethmalaniLegal Awareness and Law Resources
Nani PalkhivalaNani Palkhiwala Moot Court Competition

2

Scroll to Top